Wednesday, January 7, 2009

A Brief Introduction to KHUSHU


A Brief Introduction to KHUSHU Hamza Andreas Tzortzis
‘He it is Who has sent His Messenger (Muhammad) with guidance and the religion of truth to make it victorious over all (other) religions even though the Mushrikûn (polytheists) hate (it).’ [Qur’an 61:9]

The dawah carrier’s life revolves around a central pillar. This pillar is his mission, his goal and ultimate objective; thus everything else in his life submits to this higher purpose. Without this aspiration the believer is not a dawah carrier but someone who has made the Qur’an redundant in his heart and has refused the opportunity raise his status to a Muslim who is the ‘deputy’ of our beloved Prophet Muhammad (pbuh).

"Say: Verily, my prayer and my service of sacrifice, my life and my death are all for Allah, Lord of the Worlds." [Qur'an, 6:162]

This mission is the re-establishment of the khilafah – sincere leadership based upon the harmony and justice of Islam - the call to Islam and making Allah’s deen prevail over all other deens. Thus the dawah carrier has sold his whole life to Allah in return for His pleasure, eternal bliss and closeness with his Beloved. In pursuit of this ultimate objective the dawah carrier recognises that the Qur’an must be a seal in his heart, ever ready to walk the path of jannah; the path of revival, the call to Islam.

In order to achieve this objective and accomplish this mission, the dawah carrier must use all the tools Allah has given him to reach this goal. Due to the immense nature of this mission, it is a prerequisite that the dawah carrier ensures that he has the Islamic personality; without which his mission fails and his purpose remains just a dream.

Within the context of re-establishing the Islamic way of life, the dawah carrier has to constantly seek Allah’s (swt) pleasure by doing all the necessary actions to achieve this ultimate goal. Some of these actions include:

· Conveying the message to family and friends
· Regularly speaking to contacts
· Giving circles and talks
· Attending events and lectures
· Writing articles and letters

In addition to this he must gain enough of the necessary knowledge to facilitate the dawah and its objectives. The knowledge areas include:

· Essential Fiqh of Islam and related to the dawah
· Sufficient understanding and pursuance of politics and current affairs
· Memorising Qur’an and Hadith
· Arabic language
· General Islamic culture including the Seerah of the Prophet

Therefore the re-establishment of the Islamic way of life is dependent, through the will of Allah, upon its callers to have an Islamic personality. Consequently, this will manifest itself by the dawah carrier performing all the necessary actions and gaining knowledge to reach his goal.

However the dawah carrier will not perform any of the necessary actions with success or be endowed with knowledge in the absence of ikhlaas and khushu. Allah (swt) describes the successful believers as those who have khushu.

“It is the believers who are successful: those who have khushu (the khaashioon)…” [Qur’an 23:1-2]

Allah (swt) describes how those who have been given knowledge are people who have khushu.

“Certainly, when it is recited to them, those who were given knowledge fall on their faces in prostration, saying, ‘Glory be to our Lord! The promise of our Lord is truly fulfilled!’ Weeping, they fall to the ground in prostration, and it increases them in khushu.” [Qur’an 8: 107-109]

Allah (swt) is telling us that we will fail in our mission if we do not have Khushu. Therefore, we must understand what khushu is and initiate all the necessary steps to achieve this essential state. Not only is this state essential to gain proximity with Allah; it is a fundamental pre-requisite to achieve the sole desire of the dawah carrier – Allah’s pleasure and the establishment of His deen.

The Meaning of Khushu

The term khushu has the following meanings:

· Softness of heart
· Gentle disposition
· Submissiveness to Allah
· Yearning Allah’s pleasure
· Humility

When the believer is in a state of khushu it should affect his behaviour and actions. The messenger of Allah said “Of a surety there is a morsel of flesh in the body, if it sound, the whole body will be sound, but if it is corrupt, the whole body will be corrupt. It is the heart.” [Bukhari & Muslim]

When the heart has khushu, the whole body has khushu. This is why the Scholars would say, “If the heart of a person has khushu so would his limbs”. As a result, khushu is not just a state of mind or a condition of our hearts; it is a prerequisite for the success of the dawah.

As a dawah carrier, the believer must seek for ways to succeed in his mission. Once he has found new ways to move forward and achieve his goal, he must grab the opportunity and take action. Allah has explicitly told us how to succeed: acquire and develop khushu.

Our sincerity towards Allah (swt) should be enough motivation to use this opportunity, to achieve what is necessary for revival. Failing to attempt to achieve a state of khushu will not only be an injustice to our own souls but it will also be a grave mistake, inevitably failing in the most important issue that the ummah has faced; the re-establishment of the khilafah, the much needed shade of Allah.

The link between the salah and your mission

Brothers and Sisters! Allah (swt) has explicitly told us in His Book, that we will not achieve success in our actions or be endowed with knowledge if we do not have khushu. It is of immense importance that the dawah carriers do all the necessary actions and gain all the knowledge needed to establish Allah’s (swt) deen on this earth. If these prerequisites are not performed in the state of khushu the mission will not be accomplished and the dawah carrier will fail. Therefore khushu is as important as the ultimate objective of establishing Islam.

The development of khushu can not be achieved without salah.


Salah: The tool for change

Salah is the tool Allah (swt) has given the believer to ensure that he aligns his disposition with the message of Islam. Salah is the method to strengthen ones conviction and adherence to Allah’s (swt) commandments and abstain from His prohibitions.

“Surely, the salah prevents evil speech and bad deeds…” [Quran 29:45]

Salah is a unique act of worship that prevents the believers from anything that deserves the anger of Allah (swt). It is the ultimate medium for change for it includes all aspects of ibadah:

· Dhikr
· Praising Allah
· Dua
· Conversation with Allah
· Means for proximity with Allah
· Recitation of Qur’an
· Contemplation
· Sending salaams to the Prophet
· Enjoyment
· Means for Sabr
· Alleviation of burden
· Solace and tranquillity from the shackles of the dunya

In order to achieve success in our salah, thereby strengthening our Islamic personality, acquiring khushu is paramount.

“It is the believers who are successful: those who have khushu (the khaashioon)…” [Qur’an 23:1-2]

Brothers and Sisters! Ponder over this! If the Islamic Personality is essential for the achievement of the mission of the dawah carrier, and this personality can only be achieved and strengthened through having khushu in our salah, then its importance is as great as the mission itself!

Salah and Khushu

Mujahid, a famous tabieen, said “The foundation of khushu is in the heart and quietude in prayer”

In similar fashion Allah (swt) described the earth as having khushu:

“Among His signs is that you see the earth laid bare and then we send down water on it, it quivers and swells” Qur’an 41:39

The meaning of its quivering and its swelling is that its bareness and stillness (khushu) has been removed and in its place vegetation grows. This then shows that the khushu that it has was stillness, lowliness, and lack of growth. The same applies to the heart; when it has khushu, its base desires and thoughts arising from the following of lusts are laid to rest, and it breaks and submits to Allah. Khushu replaces the hearts remoteness, haughtiness, arrogance, and lordliness. When it settles in the heart the limbs, organs, and motions – even the voice – are stilled.

The dawah carrier must not only desire that the earth be in submission to Allah by carrying the call of the khilafah, but his heart must be full of khushu filling it with submissiveness and humility in order to achieve this.

How to Gain Khushu in Salah

In order to get the most out of salah and achieve khushu in this essential and obligatory act of ibadah, the dawah carrier must ensure that the following are in place:

Not looking around

On the authority of Abu Hurayrah who said “The Prophet would look left and right in prayer and then Allah, Mighty and Magestic, revealed,

“It is the believers who are successful: those who are humble in their prayer” [Qur’an 23:2]

So the Messenger of Allah humbled himself and would no longer look left or right.” [Abu Dawud]

On the authority of Aishah who said “I asked the Prophet about looking here and there in prayer and he said, ‘It is a snatching away that shaytaan steals from the servants prayer.’” [Bukhari]

“Prostrate and draw close” Qur’an 96:19

The sajdah is one of the greatest outward manifestations in expressing our obedience as Muslims. The believer places his symbol of his being, his face, and places it in the lowest position thereby facilitating the emergence of humility, submissiveness and yearning for Allah. It is for this reason that the Muslim is rewarded with closeness to his Lord in this position as stated by the Prophet “The closest a servant is to his Lord when he is prostrating.” [Muslim]

When the believer is in a state of sajdah he completes his state of khushu and subservience to Allah (swt) as if he is saying: ‘O Allah subservience and humility are descriptions of me. I rely on you for all my affairs, there is no help but your help, and success lies in your hands. Glory be to You, my Lord is great.’

"The closest a servant comes to his Lord is in Sujood; therefore make excessive du'a, for it is most likely to be answered." [Muslim]

When submission is truly established in the heart, only then will the believer be humble. Submission is not confined to Salah alone. Actually, submission is Islam. To understand this, we must grasp the deeper aspects of khushu.

Making du’a in sujood is the dawah carrier’s method of discoursing with his Lord. For he knows that Allah (swt) is with the humble believers who strive in His cause; he knows Allah (swt) answers the du’a of His servants.

The dawah carrier achieves a state of khushu by sincerely asking for Allah’s (swt) forgiveness, mercy and to hasten the inevitable return of the Khilafah.

Being attentive in Prayer

Isam ibn Yusuf, passed by Hatim al-Asamm who was talking in his gathering. He asked, ‘Hatim have you made your prayer good?’ he replied, ‘Yes.’ He asked, ‘How do you pray?’, he replied ‘I stand at the command, I walk in fear, I commence with the intention, I perform the takbir baring in mind His greatness, I recite at a measured pace, carefully and with contemplation, I bow with khushu, I prostrate in meekness, I sit and read the whole tashahud and then I perform the salaam in accordance to the sunnah. I pray with sincerity to Allah, Mighty and Magnificent, and yet I fear that it will not be accepted of me; however I will preserve it as much as I can until I die.’ He said ‘Keep talking for you have indeed excelled in your salah.’

Sincerity

Ikhlas, or sincerity, refers to the complete absence of negative intentions and the performance of actions purely for the sake of Allah. It means not only performing salah to fulfil the obligation, but to really establish khushu in your prayer. This in turn will create the need for salah, all out of total love for Allah, wanting to get nearer and nearer to Him, hoping for the highest level in paradise amongst the Muqarraboon, those close to Allah. The Messenger of Allah related the following:

"Allah the Almighty has said: Whosoever shows enmity to a friend of Mine, I shall be at war with him. My servant does not draw near to Me with anything more loved by Me than the religious duties I have imposed upon him, and my servant continues to draw near to Me with voluntary works so that I shall love him. When I love him I am his hearing with which he hears, his seeing with which he sees, his hand with which he strikes, and his foot with which he walks. Were he to ask (something) of Me, I would surely give it to him; and were he to ask Me for refuge, I would surely grant it to him." [Bukhari]

Introspection

"Has not he time arrived for the Believers that their hearts in all humility should engage in the remembrance of Allah and the Truth which has been revealed (to them) and that they should not become like those to whom was given the Book a foretime? But long ages passed over them and their hearts grew hard? For many among them are rebellious transgressors." Qur'an 57:16

Complacency is the not a characteristic of the dawah carrier. He should always be assessing himself using the sahaba (ra) as the yard stick and not the society that he is trying to change. He must at all times scrutinise himself by evaluating his intentions and feelings towards the mission. He should never be satisfied with his state, as the sahaba constantly worried about their motivations and inclinations. Was it not Umar (ra), of the ones who were promised paradise, that asked if his name was on the list of the hypocrites?

This should make us shiver.

Assessing the salah

In the dawah carriers attempt to establish khushu in his heart he must examine his salah daily. If there is any defect in his performance, such as missing fajr, he should repent. A sin without repentance hinders the way to success, in this case acquiring khushu. The dawah carrier has sold his whole life to raise Allah’s word as the highest on this earth. If he can not establish fajr, how can he work towards establishing Allah’s deen?

Assessment of oneself is not meant to instil a feeling of failure or incompetence. As long as the believer’s intention is for Allah’s pleasure, and he follows through with it, and continues trying, the reward will be given to him.

"Verily! As for those who believe and do righteous deeds - certainly! We shall not suffer to be lost the reward of anyone who do his (righteous) deeds in the most perfect manner." Qur'an 18:30

Recognising the defects in the believer’s salah shouldn't pull his motivation down but should rather motivate him to improve.

Brothers and Sisters! Remember! Salah is the key to closeness with Allah and the essential tool to change ourselves thereby facilitating the success of the dawah!

Arrogance

One of the enemies of the dawah carrier is arrogance and admiration of one's self. Not only is this the anti-thesis of khushu, it is a type of associating oneself with Allah.

"He who has in his heart a mustard seed of pride shall not enter Paradise." [Muslim]

The dawah carrier must never admire himself or his deeds, particularly his performance of salah. The one who strives for Allah’s pleasure looks to those who are better than himself; this will encourage and humble him.

Ihsan

"To worship Allah as though you see Him, knowing that though you cannot see Him, He sees you." [Muslim]

This profound statement, if reflected upon, must make us in awe of Allah (swt). Our bodies must shiver and our eyes must be moist from acknowledging that Allah is watching us and has knowledge of everything. Failure to understand this can only mean failure in our conviction in Allah’s attributes.

Do we not believe that Allah exists? Does He not know everything? Isn’t He All-Aware? Doesn’t He know our innermost secrets and intentions? Brothers and Sisters! We need to re-affirm our basic understanding and ensure that it has affected our hearts! These concepts and ideas are not cold concepts! They are real and essential elements that will build our personalities to ensure we are manifestations of Islam and products of this noble call!

We all know the universe has stars. For many of us, the idea of a star is a cold concept that doesn’t affect our hearts and minds. Yet, the star is a truth; it is a real phenomenon. However, for the Bedouin, the star is not just another cold concept representing a natural phenomenon – it is a reality that exists in his heart and mind that affects his whole being. For it illuminates his path and guides him towards his goal. This is how we should accept our deen and embrace these key concepts. They should remove the coldness within out hearts and bring warmth and love of the deen.

Failure to so indicates that we have not allowed the deen to mean anything in our lives – it can only suggest that we do not believe that the khilafah is the solution; but are just acting out an obligation in the cold sense of the word.

This not the description of the dawah carrier.

The dawah carrier must fall in love with the message, for it will mean that he loves Allah and His Messenger.

“None of you truly believes until your own inclinations are in accordance with the message I have brought.” [An-Nawawi from kitab al-hujjah on the authority of 'abdullah ibn 'amr ibn al-'as]

Recitation of the Qur'an and Remembrance of Allah

Recitation of the Qur'an and Dhikr, accompanied by contemplation of the meaning is one of the most tremendous ways of softening one's heart, thus gaining khushu.

"Allah has revealed the most beautiful Message in the form of a book, consistent with itself, repeating; the skins of those who fear their Lord tremble threat; then their skins and their hearts do soften to the remembrance of Allah." [Qur'an 39:23[

Recitation of the Qur'an and Dhikr is a protection from shaytaan and a cause of tranquillity of the heart. If the believer’s heart is really pure, he would never stop reciting Qur'an. 'Uthmaan radi (ra), would pray Fajr then remember Allah in Dhikr. Then he would recite Qur'an till Dhuhr!

"Those who believe and whose hearts find satisfaction in the remembrance of Allah; for without a doubt in the remembrance of Allah do hearts find satisfaction." [Qur'an 13:28].

Reflecting on All the Aspects of Salah

A man came to the Prophet and said:

"Give me brief advice in which I don't need anything else. He said to Him: "When you pray, pray like a person who is saying farewell." [Ibn Majah, Al-Hakim, and Al-Bukhari]

When you stand to pray and pronounce Allahu Akbar, reflect upon the meaning of Allah's Greatness, hoping for His reward and fearing His punishment. When you bow for rukoo' and say, Subhana Rabbi Al-Adheem strive to refine the inner feeling of your own impotence and insignificance before the Might of Allah (swt). The words Subhanna Rabbi Al-A'alaa should be said with full awareness of the believer’s complete poverty to Allah. When the prayer is concluded, the dawah carrier should feel a sense of gratitude to Allah, for having enabled him to complete this act of worship. He should imagine that he is saying his farewell prayer and that he may not live to offer another like it.

Understanding the rewards and punishments

The believer who has khushu benefits enormously whereas one who is lacking in khushu will suffer various consequences. By knowing the rewards associated with khushu and the punishments for the lack thereof, the believer may better conceive the importance of developing this very special aspect of salah.

The Rewards

1. "Successful indeed are the Mu-mineen, those who humble themselves in their prayer." [Qur'an 23:1-2]
2. The right to enter Jannah through Baab As-Salah - The door of Prayer.
3. Khushu will provide you relaxation and will become 'pleasing to the eye'. You will experience tranquillity and calmness.
"Truly man was created very impatient. Fretful when evil touches him. And niggardly when good reaches him. Not so those devoted to prayer. Those who remain steadfast in their prayer." [Qur'an 70:19-23]
4. It will become a source of strength and power and will serve as a protection from Shaytaan and provide you with stability. Allah (swt), says:
"Seek help through Sabr (patience) and Salah." [Qur'an 2:45]
This is evident in the following Hadith:
"He (pbuh), when saddened by a thing, would seek refuge in prayer." [Ahmad and Abu Dawud]
5. The falling of sins from your body. The Prophet (saws) said:

"Verily when a Muslim performs Wudu properly, and then observes Salah five times a day, his sins fall off just as these leaves have fallen off.

He then recited the following ayat:

“And establish regular prayers at the two ends of the day and at the approaches of the night; for those things which are good removes those things which are evil. That is a reminder for the mindful." [Qur'an 11:114]

The Punishments

1. Life will be full of discomfort, agony and misery.
"But whosoever turns away from My Message, verily for him is a life narrowed down, and We shall raise him up blind on the Day of Judgment." [Qur'an 20:124]
2. All deeds will be a complete loss. If Salah is not performed, it will definitely affect all other deeds in life.
"The first thing that the servant will be called to account for on the Day of Judgement will be Salah. If it is good, his deeds will have been good. If it is bad, his deeds will have been bad." [Tabarani]
3. Rejection from Allah. We know the great benefits of Allah's love. What will become of us, if He turns away from us?
"But, after them followed a posterity who lost Salah and followed after lusts; soon then will they face destruction." [Qur'an 19:59]

In the tafseer of this Ayah it is mentioned that the phrase who lost Salah does not mean that they completely stopped praying, but that they delayed it, not praying it at the proper time.

Surah al-Fatiha

"There is no prayer for whom do not read the Fatiha." [Bukhari & Muslim]

Surah al-Fatiha is a pillar of salah. It is recited at least 25 times a day for the Muslim who completes the obligatory prayer and the sunnah. It is the first surah believers learn as a child and it is a chapter of the Qur’an Muslims are most familiar with.

To facilitate the development of khushu it is of immense importance that the dawah carrier understands, reflects, contemplates and meditates on surah al-Fatiha.

The Name of the Surah

Due to the surah’s importance and comprehensiveness it has been named Ummul Qur`an, the Mother of the Qur`an, and Ummul Kitab, the Mother of the Book..

Ibn Jareer at-Tabari said that it was named so because the meaning of the entire Qur`an is summarised therein. The Arabs named anything that concisely summarises something or comprises the most important part of something Umm, or Mother.

For similar reasons it is also named al-Qur`an al-Adheem, the Great Qur`an. It is also named Sab`ul Mathani, the Seven Oft Repeated Verses, because they are frequently recited and indeed recited in every rak`ah of salah.

It is also named ar-Ruqya, the Spiritual Cure due to the hadeeth of Abu Sa`eed (RA) reported in Bukhari that after he had recited it to cure a person who had been bitten by a scorpion, the Messenger of Allah said to him,

“And what made you to know that it was a ruqya?” [Bukhari]

Isti`adhah (Seeking Refuge)

Before the believer recites surah al-Fatiha he must seek refuge from Shaytaan. Allah (swt) tells us to seek refuge in Him from Shaytaan – our enemy and the enemy of the dawah.

“Show forgiveness, enjoin what is good and turn away from the foolish. And if an evil suggestion comes to you from Shaytaan then seek refuge with Allaah. Indeed He is All-Hearing, All-Knowing.” [Qur’an 7: 99-200]

“Repel [evil] with that which is better then indeed the one, between whom and you there was enmity, [will become] as though he was a devoted friend. But none is granted [this quality] except those who are patient and none is granted it save one who possesses a great portion [of high moral character]. And if an evil suggestion comes to you from Shaytaan then seek refuge with Allaah. Indeed He is All-Hearing, All-Knowing.” [Qur’an 41:34-46]

“When you wish to read the Qur`an then seek refuge with Allah from the accursed Shaytaan. Indeed he has no power over those who believe and put their trust only in their Lord. His power is only over those who follow him and join partners with Him.” [Qur’an 16:99-100]

al-Qayyim, may Allaah have mercy upon him, explained the meaning of a`oodhu (I take refuge) in a beautiful way. He said,

“Know that the verb `aadha and its derivatives carry the meaning of being careful and wary, guarding and fortifying, being rescued and victorious. Its essential meaning is to flee from that which you fear will harm you to that which will safeguard you from it. This is why the one you seek refuge with is named m`aadh and malja` (the source of refuge and recourse).”

Brothers and Sisters! Reflect on the beauty and the wisdom of this statement. The dawah carrier must always be willing to cling to Allah and ensure he is far away from the path of shaytaan.

The Basmallah

Bismi Allahi alrrahmani alrraheemi
In the name of Allah, Most Gracious, Most Merciful

“I was riding behind the Prophet (SAW) when his mount stumbled and so I said, ‘may Shaytaan perish!’ Upon hearing this the Prophet (SAW) said, "do not say may Shaytaan perish for when you say this Shaytaan becomes exultant and grows in stature and says, ‘it was by my power that I injured him.’ But when you say, ‘with the Name of Allaah’ he becomes humiliated and grows small until he ends up the size of a fly." [Abu Daawud & Ahmad]

Ibn Mas`ud said, “Whosoever wishes to the saved from the nineteen Angels over Hellfire then let him recite with the Name of Allaah, Most Beneficient, Most Merciful.”

Reflect upon the power of the basmallah, its significance and its beauty. Allah is the most gracious in that we can see the manifestations of that grace and compassion. Humanity has been given a message, Islam, to take the out of darkiness into light! We have been given health, wealth and family! We have been given this life and the opportunity to achieve higher goals and objectives such as closeness with the Lord of the Universe! Allah’s grace encompasses everything and can been seen in the birth of a child to the water that we drink.

Allah (swt) is also most merciful in that this mercy has been reserved for the believers. He has given the believers jannah with its everlasting bliss!

All Praises

Alhamdu lillahi rabbi alAAalameena
All Praises is due to Allah, Lord of the Worlds

This verse means that every and all types praise are due to Allah. The ‘li’ here indicates ‘deserved praise’ rather than the mistranslated ‘owner of praise’. Allah deserves all praise because He is the creator of the whole universe! Everything good is from Him! He is the source of everything!

Allah (swt) is the Lord of the universe. The Arabic word ‘Rabb’ translated as ‘Lord’ has connotations of the cherisher, sustainer, caring and compassionate Creator. These are the meaning the dawah carrier must reflect on when pronouncing this word.

The world ‘Aalameen’ comes from the root for sign, indicating that the whole world and universe is a sign of Allah’s creation. This word, usually translated as ‘Worlds’, means all of creation. Therefore the dawah carrier is praising the cherisher, sustainer and creator of the whole of existence! All Praise is due to Allah!

Most Merciful

Alrrahmani alrraheemi
Most Gracious, Most Merciful

These are two descriptions of Allah and two of the Names from amongst His Beautiful Names derived from ar-Rahma (Mercy) in a way to express intense and exaggerated meanings.

The graciousness and mercy of Allah (swt) is now more clearly understood by reflecting on the previous verses. Allah being the Lord or the Universe and the sustainer and cherisher has indeed given humanity a gift and a blessing called life.

Accountability

Maliki yawmi alddeeni
King/Owner of the Day of Judgment

This life that Allah (swt) has given us should not be taken for granted. Humanity will be accounted for the blessings given to them. There is a judgment, an inevitable day of recompense, of which our deeds will not be unaccounted for.

The meaning of the verse would be that on that Day, Kingship belongs to Allah Alone and not to any of the creation who before then used to be kings on earth, vying with each other for power and dominion, exulting in what they had, pompously boasting about their grandeur and trying their best to outdo their competitors. However on that day they will come to know with certainty that in reality they are powerless and humiliated and that Grandeur, Power and Authority belongs in its entirety to Him Alone. Allah says,

"That Day when they will all come out, nothing of them will be hidden from Allah. Whose is the kingdom this Day? It belongs to Allah, the One, the Irresistible!" [Qur’an 40:16]

The other the meaning of the verse would be that on that Day, everything would belong to Him and no one else. No one will be able to voice an opinion or enforce a ruling as they used to do on this world. Allah says,

"That Day on which the Spirit and the Angels will stand forth in rows, none shall speak except he whom the Most Beneficent allows and he will speak only that which is correct and true." [Qur’an 78: 38]

"All voices will be humbled for the Most Beneficent and nothing shall you hear but the low sound of their footsteps." [Qur’an 20:108]

"They cannot intercede except for one with whom He is pleased." [Qur’an 21:28]

Worship and Help

Iyyaka naAAbudu wa-iyyaka nastaAAeenu
You alone we worship; You alone we ask for help.

This verse is an affirmation of ‘la ilaha ila Allah’. This verse points to the actualisation of its meaning. It is comprised of two matters: negation and affirmation. So the negation aspect, contained in the words la ilaha, means to remove every single object of worship apart from Allah in all the actions of worship. The affirmation aspect, contained in the words ila Allah, means to single out the Lord of the heavens and the earth Alone for all matters of worship in the way that has been legislated by the Share`ah.

This negation in the laa ilaaha illaa Allaah was indicated by placing the object of worship first in the verse such that it reads "You Alone…" It is established in the rules of the Arabic language that placing the object first in a sentence is one of the ways of confining the meaning of the verb to the object alone.

“And whosoever rejects all that is worshipped besides Allaah and believes in Allaah has held onto the most trustworthy handhold” [Qur’an 2:256]

Brothers and Sisters! Reflect upon this! Is it not one of the highest forms of worship to struggle in His cause to make His word the highest?

Request

Ihdina alssirata almustaqeema
Guide us to the straight path

Meaning that we do not seek aid from anyone but You because the affair in its totality is under Your control Alone, no one else has even an atoms weight of control over it. Again the object of the verb has been brought before the verb to stress this fact. In this statement’s following His saying, ‘You Alone we worship’ lies an indication that it is not permissible to put our trust in anyone except the One Who deserves worship because no one else has control over the affairs. This meaning which is indicated here is clearly explained in other verses, like His saying:

“So worship Him and put your trust in Him” [Qur’an 12:123]

Why does the verse state ‘we worship’ when there is only one person reciting it? The answer lies in the fact that the wise Share`ah has legislated many actions of worship to be done in congregation and it has also recommended the servant of Allah to supplicate for his brother Muslims. Significantly the re-establishment of the khilafah can not be done alone; we need to work in a jama’a..

The Path

Sirata allatheena anAAamta AAalayhim ghayri almaghdoobi AAalayhim wala alddalleena
The path of those upon whom you have bestowed your blessings. Not (the path) of those upon whom their portion is anger, nor of those who go astray.

After praising Allah, the believer then proceeds to ask of Him from His bounty and blessings. This is the most virtuous way of asking Allah by first praising Him and then asking of Him.

“The Messenger of Allaah (SAW) heard a man supplicating in prayer. He did not glorify Allaah and neither did he invoke blessings on the Prophet (SAW). The Messenger of Allaah (SAW) said, "he made haste." He then named him and said to him or to those around him, "if any one of you prays, he should commence by glorifying his Lord and praising Him; he should invoke peace and blessings on the Prophet (SAW) and thereafter he should supplicate Allaah for anything he wishes." [Abu Daawud, at-Tirmidhi, an-Nasa’i, Ahmad]

Al-Ghadab linguistically means anger; it is the opposite of pleasure (ridaa) and one of the Attributes of Allah. Maghdoob refers to the objects of Anger.

Dalaal linguistically means to divert from the intended goal or to diverge from the true path and it is the opposite of guidance.

"And indeed you [O Muhammad] are guiding [mankind] to the Straight Path." [Qur’an 42:52]

The Essence of Surah al-Fatiha

"Allah the Exalted had said: I have divided the prayer into two halves between My servant, and My servant and Me will receive what he asks. When the servant says:

"Praise is to Allah, the Lord of the universe",

Allah the Most High says:

"My servant has praised Me."

And when he (the servant) says:

“The Most Compassionate, the Merciful",

Allah the Most High says: "My servant has lauded Me."

And when he (the servant) says:" Master of the Day of Judgment,"

He remarks: "My servant has glorified Me," and sometimes He would say: "My servant entrusted (his affairs) to Me."

And when he (the worshipper) says: "(You) we do worship and of (You) we do ask help,"

He (Allah) says:

"This is between My servant, and My servant and Me will receive what he asks for."

Then, when he (the worshipper) says: "Guide us to the straight path, the path of those to whom you have bestowed your Gracious, not (the way) of those who earned Your anger, nor of those who went astray." He (Allah) says: "This is for My servant, and My servant will receive what he asked for." [Muslim]

O Brothers and Sisters! Allah is telling us that we will be guided and that He will help us! Let us be sincere in this mission and ask Allah to protect and guide this ummah. Let us pray with khushu to facilitate the dawah and let us plead for His forgiveness and the inevitable victory!

"Indeed, Allah will aid those who aid His cause. Indeed Allah is all-Powerful, all-Mighty." [Qur’an 22:40]

Reject Freedom of Speech

Reject Freedom of Speech
Hamza Andreas Tzortzis

Muslims have over a thousand years of scientific and intellectual progress. When Europe was in the ‘Dark Ages’ the Islamic society produced scholars that were to become the reference points for medicine, chemistry, mathematics, architecture and many other fields of science and engineering. According to historians of science, the Muslims were the cause for bringing Europe out of the darkness of ignorance. Robert Briffault in the "Making of Humanity" states the following:

"For Although there is not a single aspect of European growth in which the decisive influence of Islamic Culture is not traceable, nowhere is it so clear and momentous as in the genesis of that power which constitutes the permanent distinctive force of the modern world, and the supreme source of its victory, natural science and the scientific spirit.”

"The debt of our science to that of the Arabs does not consist in startling discoveries or revolutionary theories, science owes a great deal more to Arab culture, it owes its existence.”

Muslims are all for progress and development. Freedom of speech, however, is not a necessity for progress and development. This is an assumption based upon Europe’s historical struggle against the Church that prevented progress and investigation. Muslims do not have the same historical baggage.

Muslims reject freedom of speech in its pure meaning. This is not due to a backward mentality or a stubborn opposition to all things Western. Freedom of speech means the unrestricted expression of oneself. This however does not exist, can not exist and should not be imagined to exist.

Looking at freedom of speech in Western secular states the same is also true. There are many restrictions; for example there are hate speech laws, defamation laws, libel laws etc. In reality people can express themselves within the context of the law, and not with unrestricted freedom.

Furthermore, when Islam and Muslims are attacked under the banner of freedom of speech, a contradiction is highlighted. There are laws in place to prevent offending religious minorities such as the Jews. Taking the Danish cartoons of the Prophet Muhammad as an example, if the cartoons where of holocaust denial it would be against the law, or viewed as incisive. When it came to the Muslims it was a different story.

Even if one where to ignore the apparent contradictions, it can be argued that civilised society cannot engage with one another positively if one can say whatever they want. Initiating dialogue by abusing one another will not produce positive results!

Muslims and the book of the Muslims, the Qur’an, encourage thinking and debate. This is reflected in our history and scholarship. However, abuse and unrestricted forms of expression creates hatred and discourages true dialogue. This is aptly put by the Qur’an itself:

“Invite to the Way of your Lord with wisdom and beautiful speech; and argue with them in ways that are best and most gracious. For your Lord knows best who have strayed from His Path and who receive guidance.”(Qur'an chapter 16, verses 25)

“And insult not those whom they (disbelievers) worship besides Allah, lest they insult Allah wrongfully without knowledge. Thus We have made fair-seeming to each people its own doings; then to their Lord is their return and He shall then inform them of all that they used to do.” (Qur'an chapter 6, verses 108)

The Bible: Its Alterations, Compilation & Translation

The Bible: Its Alterations, Compilation & Translation
Hamza Andreas Tzortzis

‘Woe to those who write the “scripture” with their own hands, then say “This is from God” in order to exchange it for a small price. Woe to them for what their own hands have written and Woe to them for what they earn’ {Baqarah: 79}

Martin Kahler notes “We do not possess any sources for a ‘life of Jesus’ which a historian can accept as reliable and adequate. I repeat: we have no sources for a biography of Jesus of Nazareth which measures up to the contemporary standards of contemporary historical science.” 1

Kenneth Cragg states about the New Testament, “There is condensation and editing, there is choice production and witness. The Gospels have come through the mind of the church behind the authors. They represent experience and history.”

Similarly, Dr Von Tishendorf, one of the most resolute conservative defenders of the trinity, admitted that the New Testament had “in many passages undergone such serious modification of meaning as to leave us in painful uncertainty as to what the Apostles had actually written.” 2

The purpose of this section is to bring together the facts about the Bible, as presented by many Christian scholars. It is interesting that the author of the Old Testament book, Jeremiah, recognized the same facts all those many years ago: “How can you say. “We are wise, we have the law of the Lord,” when scribes with their lying pens have falsified it? The wise are put to shame; they are dismayed and entrapped. They have spurned the word of the Lord, so what sort of wisdom is theirs?” 3

Alteration and Transmission of the bible

Theologians recognize that the bible contains many contradictions and prefer not to explain them away as some do. Simply, they accept this fact often without a rejection of their belief. It is such honesty that accounts for the large number of Christian scholars looking into the origins of their religion.

After listing many examples of contradictions in the bible, Dr Frederic Kenyon says: “Besides the larger discrepancies, such as these contradictions, there is scarcely a verse in which there is not some variation of phrase in some copies (of ancient manuscripts from which the bible has been collected). No one can say that those additions or omissions or alterations are matters of mere indifference.” 4

It is in the preface of the Revised Standard Version of the bible, 1978, that thirty-two Christian scholars “of the highest eminence,” backed by fifty Christian denominations, wrote of the authorized version, also known as the King James Version, that : “The King James Version have grave defects, so many and so serious as to call for revision.”

In 1957, the Jehovah’s Witnesses published the headline “50,000 errors in the Bible” in their AWAKE magazine writing: “There are probably 50,000 errors in the bible, errors which have crept in the bible text.” 5 Nevertheless, they go on to say, “As a whole the bible is still accurate.”?!

In The Story of the Manuscripts, the Reverend George E. Mernil quotes Professor Arnold as stating: “There are not more than 1500 to 2000 places in which there is any uncertainty as to the true text.”

The Five Gospels written by the ‘Jesus Seminar,’ a group of seventy-four renowned Christian scholars from biblical studies institutes and universities all over the world, 6 was the result of six years of dedicated study.

Deciding to produce a translation of the gospels which would not be biased by their personal Christian faith, they endeavoured to discover the true words of Jesus in the bible. From the whole text they selected those passages that they believed were the valid sayings of Jesus, and colour-coded them.

Although we have reservations about their elimination of longer passages which ignores the oral cultures’ memorization ability, as well as the Jesus seminar’s tendency to equate the miraculous with myth, their conclusion was that: “82% of the words ascribed to Jesus in the gospels were not actually spoken by him.” 7

They go on to say: “Biblical scholars and theologians alike have learned to distinguish the Jesus of history from the Christ of faith. It has been a painful lesson for both the church and scholarship. The distinction between the two figures is the difference between a historical person who lived in a particular time and place and a figure who has been assigned a mythical role, in which he descends from heaven to rescue mankind and, of course, eventually return there.”

The quotes above are merely the authors’ opinions, the second quote about the mythical role can be understood from the fact that the concept of Jesus in Christianity is largely based on pagan roman mythical characters.

From the Jesus seminar is an archaeological fact that is far more important than what can be regarded as ‘their opinion’: “In fact we do not have original copies of any of the gospels. We do not possess autographs of any of the books of the entire bible. The oldest surviving copies of the gospels date from about 175 years after the death of Jesus, and no two copies are precisely alike. And handmade manuscripts have almost always been “corrected” here and there, often by more than one hand. Further, this gap of almost two centuries means that the original Greek (or Aramaic) text was copied more than once, by hand before reaching the stage in which it has come down to us.” 8

“The oldest copies of any substantial potion of the Greek gospels still in existence – so far as we know- date to about 200 C.E. However, a tiny fragment of the gospel of john can be dated to approximately 125 C.E. or earlier, the same approximate dates of the fragments of the Egerton Gospel (Egerton is the name of the donor). But these fragments are too small to afford more than tiny apertures onto the history of the text. More of the important copies of the Greek gospels have been “unearthed” – mostly in museums, monasteries, and church archives – in the 19th and 20th centuries.” 9

They finally sum up this issue by saying: “…the stark truth is that the history of the Greek gospels, from their creation in the first century until the discovery of the first copies at the beginning of the third century, remains largely unknown and therefore unmapped territory.”

Peake’s Commentary of the Bible notes: “It is well known that the primitive Christian gospel was initially transmitted by word of mouth and that this oral tradition resulted in variant reporting of word and deed. It is equally true that when the Christian record was committed to writing, it continued to be the subject of verbal variation, involuntary and intentional, at the hands of scribes and editors.” 10

Encyclopedia Britannica highlights: “Yet, as a matter of fact, every book of the New Testament, with the exception of the four great epistles of St. Paul is at present more or less the subject of controversy and interpolations (inserted verses) are asserted even in these.11

After listing many examples of contradictory statements in the bible, Dr Frederic Kenyon states: “Besides the larger discrepancies, such as these, there is scarcely a verse in which there is not some variation of phrase in some copies (of the ancient manuscripts from which the bible has been collected). No one can say that these additions or omissions or alterations are matters of mere indifference.” 12

Ehrman mentions: “In any event, none of the original manuscripts of the books of the bible now survive. What do survive are copies made over the course of the centuries, or more accurately, copies of the copies of the copies, some 5366 of them in the Greek language alone, that date from the second century down to the sixteenth. Strikingly with the exception of the smallest fragments, no two of these copies are exact. No on knows how many different, or variant readings, occur among the surviving witnesses, but they must number in the hundreds of thousands.” 13

Toland observes: “We know already to what degree, imposture and credulity went hand in hand in the primitive times of the Christian church, the last being as ready to receive as the first was ready to forge books. This evil grew afterwards not only greater when the monks were the sole transcribers and the sole keepers of all books good or bad, but in the process of time it became almost absolutely impossible to distinguish history from fable, or truth from error as to the beginning and original monuments of Christianity. How immediate successors of the Apostles could so grossly confound the genuine teaching of their masters with such as was falsely attributed to them? Or since they were in the dark about these matters so early, how came such as followed them by a better light? And observing that such apocryphal books were often put upon the same footing with the canonical books by the Fathers. I propose these two questions: Why should all the books cited genuine by Clement of Alexander, Origen, Tertullian and the rest of such writers not be accounted equally authentic? And what stress should be laid on the testimony of those Fathers who not only contradict one another but are also often inconsistent with themselves in relation of the very same facts?” 14

Ehrman states further that: “Nonetheless, there are some kind of textual changes for which it is difficult to account apart from the deliberate activity of a transcriber. When a scribe appended an additional twelve verses to the end of the Gospel of Mark, this can scarcely be attributed to mere oversight.” 15

Peake’s Commentary on the Bible: “It is now generally agreed that 9-20 are not an original part of Mark. They are not found in the oldest manuscript, and indeed were apparently not in the copies used by Matthew and Luke. A 10th century Armenian Manuscript ascribes the passage to Ariston, the Presbyter mentioned by Papias (Ap. Eus. HE III, xxxix, 15).”

Kenyon et al note that: “Indeed an Armenian translation of St. Mark has quite recently been discovered, in which the last twelve verses of St. Mark are ascribed to Ariston, who is otherwise known as one of the earliest of the Christian Fathers; and it is quite possible that this tradition is correct.” 16

M. A. Yusseff observes: “As is happens, Victor Tununesis, a sixth century African bishop related in his chronicle (566 AD) that when Messala was consul at Constantinople (506 AD), he “censured and corrected” the gentile gospels written by persons considered illiterate by the emperor Anastasias. The implication was that they were altered to conform to sixth century Christianity of previous centuries.” 17

Godfrey Higgins: “It is impossible to deny that the Benedictine Monks of St. Maur, as far as Latin and Greek language went, were very learned and talented. In Cleland’s Life of Lanfranc – Archbishop of Canterbury, is the following passage: “Lanfranc, a Benedictine Monk, Archbishop of Canterbury, having found the scriptures much corrupted by copyists, applied himself to correct them, as also the writings of the Fathers, agreeably to the orthodox faith, Secundum Fidem Orthodxum”.” 18

Higgins goes on to say: “The same Protestant divine has this remarkable passage: “Impartially exacts from me the confession, that the orthodox have in some places altered the Gospels…(The New Testament) in as many passages has undergone such serious modification of meaning as to leave us in painful uncertainty as to what the Apostles had actually written.” 19

In all, Tischendorf uncovered over 14,800 “corrections” to just one ancient manuscript of the Bible, the Codex Sinaiticus (one of the two most ancient copies of the bible available to Christianity today), by nine (some say ten) separate “correctors,” which had been applied to this one manuscript over a period from 400 C.E. to about 1200 C.E.

Teschendorf strove in his dealings with the text to be as honest and as humanly possible. For this reason he could not understand how the scribes could have so continuously and so callously “allowed themselves to bring in here and there changes, which were not simple verbal changes, but materially affected the meaning,” or why they “did not shrink from cutting out a passage or inserting one.”

In the preface of the new Revised Standard Version of the Bible 20 we read: “Yet the King James Version has serious defects. By the middle of the 19th century, the development of biblical studies and the discovery of many biblical manuscripts more ancient than those on which the King James Version was based, made it apparent that these defects were so many as to call for revision.”

In the introduction to the same ‘version’ they say: “occasionally it is evident that the text has suffered in the transmission and that none of the versions provides a satisfactory restoration. Here we can only follow the best judgment of competent scholars as to the most probable reconstruction of the original text.” 21

The great luminary of western literature, Edward Gibbon, explains the tampering of the Bible with the following words: “Of all the manuscripts now extant, above fourscore in number, some of which are more than 1200 years old, the orthodox copies of the Vatican, of the Complutensian editors, of Robert Stephens are becoming invisible; and the two manuscripts of Dublin and Berlin are unworthy to form an exception. In the 11th and 12th century C.E. the bibles were corrected by Lanfranc, Archbishop of Canterbury, and by Nicholas, a cardinal and librarian of the Roman Church, Secundum Fidem Orthodxum. Not withstanding these corrections, the passage is still wanting in 25 Latin manuscripts, the oldest and fairest; two qualities seldom united, except in manuscripts. The three witnesses have been established in our Greek Testaments by the Prudence of Erasmus; the honest bigotry of the Complutensian editors; the typographical fraud, or error, of Robert Stephens in the placing of a crochet and the deliberate falsehood, or strange misapprehension of Theodore Beza.” 22

Thiede’s First Century Fragments

There are some who claim to hold early Christian texts, notable the German scholar, Carston Thiede. Thiede claimed to have discovered three papyrus fragments of Matthew’s Gospel from the first Century, 100 years earlier than previously thought. Thus, these fragments could be viewed as ‘eye-witness’ accounts of the life of Jesus. This opinion was popular with evangelical Christians such as Joseph ‘Jay’ Smith, who relies heavily on Thiede’s work.

Graham Stanton one of Britain’s most eminent New Testament scholars and a leading specialist on Matthew’s gospel refuted the claims of Thiede. Criticism was also gathered from 10 other prominent scholars in the field. The following, along with Stanton, also refute the erroneous claim made by Thiede that a fragment of Mark’s gospel has been found amongst the Dead Sea Scrolls: Professor Hartmut Stegemann, a leading Qumran specialist who teaches at the university of Gottingen; Professor Hans-Udo Rosenbaum of the university of Munster; Dr. R.G. Jenkins of Melbourne and Dr Timothy Lim, the Qumran specialist from Edinburgh.23

Thiede’s extremely radical claims were discredited by the Jewish scholar Hershel Shanks in the May/ June 1997 issue of Biblical Archaeological Review and Thiede’s work was also referred to in the same journal as “ Junk Scholarship.” 24

Professor Keith Elliot of the University of Leeds published a very critical review of The Jesus Papyrus, Thiede’s book, in Novum Testamentum, a leading journal in which publishes specialist articles on the New Testament writings and related topics. January 1997 saw the publication of T.C. Skeat’s research, The Oldest Manuscript of the Four Gospels, in New Testament Studies, another important academic journal. Recognized as a leading manuscript on Greek manuscripts for sixty years, Skeat shows that beyond reasonable doubt, the fragments of Matthew and Luke belonged to the earliest surviving four gospel codex. On page 30 of his research, Skeat says: “If I say that I prefer to keep Robert’s late second century dating, it is because I feel that circa 200 C.E. gives an unwarranted air of precision.”

Stanton’s own research on the origin and theological significance of the fourfold gospel was published in New Testament Studies in July 1997.25 he mentions that the earliest Christian writer who seems to have known and used four gospels is Justin Martyr who used his Apology and his Dialogue shortly after the second century. Stanton says: “There is no earlier evidence…in the period shortly before 150 AD Christians began to include four gospels in one Codex. This practice encouraged acceptance of the fourfold gospel, i.e. the conviction that the four gospels- no more- no less- are the Churches foundation writings.” 26

Stanton also stipulates that his conclusion is somewhat more cautious than the generally accepted view that the fourfold gospels were an innovation when Iranaeus wrote in about 180 C.E. other important studies that have ruled out Thiede’s claims include:

Dr Klaus Wachel’s work published in Zeitschrift fur Papyrologie und Epigraphik 27
Peter M. Head in ‘The Date of Magdalen Papyrus of Matthew – A Response to C.P. Thiede.’ 28
D.C. Parker in ‘Was Matthew Written Before 50 C.E.? – The Magdalen Papyrus of Matthew. 29

In a special issue devoted to the gospels, the popular German news magazine, Der Spiegal, noted in May 1996 that a famous contemporary papyrologist, Peter Parsos, Regius Professor of Greek at Oxford University, has also presented evidence that flies in the face of Carston Thiede’s hypothesis.

Translation of the Bible

We would like to bring the reader’s attention to the scholar William Tyndale and his students who were persecuted and branded as heretics by the established church in the 16th century for merely translating the bible into the English language for the benefit of the masses for the English people who could not read Latin.(!?)

Up until this time, it was illegal for the “layman” to even look at the bible; one had to be a fully qualified priest or clergyman!? So it actually took the established church which claims today to be for all of humanity, 1600 years before they realized that the bible (so called ‘word of God’) should be made accessible in other languages!

Tyndale sometimes referred to as the ‘Father of the English Bible’, he was born in Gloucestershire and educated at Oxford (B.A. in 1512 and M.A. in 1515) and at Cambridge where he studied Greek. Tyndale’s translation, which was done in exile in Germany, was the first printed New Testament in English translated from Greek. Cuthbert Tunstall, Bishop of London at the time, bought copies of Tyndale’s translation in huge numbers in order for them to be burnt in public. Thomas Moore published a dialogue in which he denounced Tyndale’s translation as being “not worthy to be called ‘Christ’s Testament,’ but rather ‘Tyndale’s own testament’ or the testament of his master – the Antichrist.”

During his time in Antwerp, many attempts were made to lure him back to England. He was arrested by agents of Emperor Charles the 5th and taken to Vilvorde, six miles north of Brussels, where he was imprisoned in a fortress on 21 May 1535.

In august 1536 he was tried, and found guilty of heresy (for having the nerve to even translate the Bible!!) and turned over to the secular power for execution. On 6 October 1536, William Tyndale was strangled and burned at the stake.30 John Wycliff and his students, known as Lollards, also suffered similar persecution for translating the bible into English.

The evangelical Christians would say that the people who persecuted the two characters, Tyndale and Wycliff, were not “real Christians”, yet at the same time the evangelical Christians denounced and brand as “heretical” the original followers of Jesus who had similar beliefs to Islam. The lack of tolerance in Christianity is demonstrated in the way it has always treated “heretics” and this kind of demonstration is actually endemic to Christianity of whatever brand. The detailed histories of John Wycliff and William Tyndale can be found in most history books about the Church in England.

References:

1: Martin Kahler, The So-called Historical Jesus and the Historical Biblical Christ,
2: Kenneth Cragg, The Call of the Minaret, p. 277
3: James Bentley, Secrets of Mount Sinai, p 117
4:The book of Jeremiah 8: 8-9
5. Frederic Kenyon, Our Bible and The Ancient Manuscripts
6. 8th September 1957
7. Jesus Seminar, Robert W Funk and Roy W Hoover, The Five gospels (1993), p. 533-537
8. ibid. p5
9. ibid. p6
10. ibid. p9
11. Peake’s commentary on the Bible, p 633
12. Encyclopedia Britannica, 12th Edition, Vol 3, p643
13. Kenyon, Eyre and Spottiswoode, Our Bible and the Ancient Manuscripts, p 3
14. Bart Ehrman, The Orthodox Corruption of Scripture, p 27
15. John Tolend, the Nazarenes (1718), p 73
16. The Orthodox Corruption of Scripture, p27-28
17: Our Bible and the Ancient Manuscripts, p 7-8
18. MA Yusseff, The Dead Sea Scrolls, the Gospel of Barnabas and the New Testament, p81
19. Sir Godfrey Higgins, History of the
20. James Bentley, Secrets of Mount Sinai, p117
21: Oxford Press
22: Edward Gibbon, Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, vol 4, p 418
23: Graham Stanton, Gospel Truth (1997) p 200-202
24: Biblical Archaeological Review (Jan/ Feb 1997)
25: New Testament Studies, vol 43 (July 1997) p 317-346
26: Gospel Truth p197
27: Vol 107 (1995) p 73-80
28: In Tyndale Bulletin Vol 46 (1995) p251-285
29: Expository Times, Vol 107 (1995), p 40-43
30: Bruce Metzger and Michael D Coogan (eds), The Oxford Companion to the Bible (OUP: 1993), p 758-759

Source: Before Nicea - The Early Followers of Jesus

Is the Quran Just a book of Signs?


Is the Quran Just a book of Signs?
Hamza Andreas Tzortzis

Anyone who picks up a translation of the Qur'an or even the Arabic original, will find that the word 'aya' is used many times. This word, which is also the name for Qur'anic verses, is commonly translated as 'a sign'.

It has been previously mentioned that the context of a particular Qur'anic construction influences the meanings of the words within that structure. With regards to the word 'aya' it conveys the following meanings:

Miracle
Sign
Ethical Message
Something Amazing
Symbol
Proof
Evidence

The examples above can be found throughout the whole of the Qur'an, examples include:

Miracle

They say: "Why does he not produce for us a miracle..." Qur'an: 20:133

Sign

A sign of his authority is that there shall come to you the Ark of the Covenant, with (an assurance) therein of security from your Lord. Qur'an:2:248

Ethical Message

There is a message indeed for people who (are willing to) listen. Qur'an 16:65

Something Amazing/Symbol

We made the son of Mary and his mother a symbol (of Our grace). Qur'an 23:50

Proof

And recite ot them the news of Nuh (Noah). When he said to his people: "O my people, if my stay (with you), and my reminding (you) of the Ayats (proofs) of Allah is hard on you, then put my trust in Allah." Qur'an 10:71

According to al-Suyuti the total number of Qur'anic verses ('aya') are 6616. In the Islamic intellectual tradition the whole of the Qur'an is regarded as a sign and a miracle [1]. The Qur'an expresses natural phenomena as perceptible indications of the not immediately apparent truth. It directs mankind to think and uses persuasive language to enhance its message. The Qur'an must be pondered over and anyone who approaches this book superficially will lose out on its mutli-layered meanings; and its dynamic profound expressions and messages.

What, do they not ponder the Qur’an? Or, is it that there are locks on their hearts? Qur'an 47:24

A Book We have sent down, [it is] full of blessings, that men may ponder over its messages, and those who possess understanding may take them to heart Qur'an 38:29

Do they not reflect within themselves: God did not create the heavens and the earth and what is between them two but with truth, and (for) an appointed term? Qur'an 30:8

We explain the signs in detail for those who reflect Qur'an 10:24

Indeed here are signs self-evident in the hearts of those endowed with knowledge: And none but the unjust reject Our signs Qur'an 29:49

Some Signs for Reflection

There are thousands of verses that evoke thought and require meditation. Below are some examples:

What will explain to you what the steep path is? It is to free a slave, to feed at a time of hunger, an orphaned relative or a poor person in distress, and to be one of those who believe and urge one another to steadfastness and compassion Qur'an 90: 11-20

Are, then, they who are bent on denying the truth not aware that the heavens and the earth were once one single entity, which We then perted asunder? And that We made out of water every living thing? Qur'an 21:30

People, be mindful of your Lord, who created you from a single soul Qur'an 4:1

Every soul shall taste death Qur'an 3:185

If you are steadfast and mindful of God, that is the best course Qur'an 3:186

Why do you mix truth with falsehood? Why do you hide the turh when you recognize it? Qur'an 3:71

Why should you not fight in God's cause and for those oppressed men. women, and children who cry out, 'Lord, rescue us from this town whose people are oppressors! By Your grace, gives us a protector and give us a helper!'? The believers fight for God's cause, while those who reject faith fight for an unjust cause Qur'an 4:75-76

...bear witness impartially: do not let the hatred of others lead you away from justice, but adhere to justice, for that is closer to the awareness of God. Be mindful of God... Qur'an 5:8

Man should reflect on what he was created from Qur'an 86:5

So truly were there is hardship there is also ease, truly where there is hardship there is also ease Qur'an 94:5-6

Read! in the name of your Lord who created: He created man from a clinging form Qur'an 96:1-2

By (the Token of) Time (through the ages), Verily Man is in loss, Except such as have Faith, and do righteous deeds, and (join together) in the mutual teaching of Truth, and of Patience and Constancy Qur'an 103:1-3

Woe to every slanderer, defamer. Who amasses wealth and considers it a provision (against mishap); He thinks that his wealth will make him immortal Qur'an 104:1-3

Say, 'He is God the One, God the Eternal. He begot no one nor was He begotten. No one is comparable to Him.' Qur'an 112:1-4

There are thousands more verses that allude to creation, natural phenomenon, spirituality, society, politics and more. The Qur'an needs to be read with an open mind and a sincere heart, in order to appreciate that it is not just a book of signs but a foundation for an entirely unique way of life.

"Neither as Christians or Jews, nor simply as intellectually responsible individuals, have members of Western Civilisation been sensitively educated or even accurately informed about Islam… even some persons of goodwill who have gained acquaintance with Islam continue to interpret the reverence for the prophet Muhammad and the global acceptance of his message as an inexplicable survival of the zeal of an ancient desert tribe. This view ignores fourteen centuries of Islamic civilisation, burgeoning with artists, scholars, statesmen, philanthropists, scientists, chivalrous warriors, philosophers… as well as countless men and women of devotion and wisdom from almost every nation of the planet. The coherent world civilisation called Islam, founded in the vision of the Qur'an, cannot be regarded as the product of individual and national ambition, supported by historical accident." [2]

Notes

[1] http://www.theinimitablequran.com/

[2] Lex Hixon. The Heart of the Qur'an. Quest Books.

Is the Quran a Shapeless Book?


Is the Quran a Shapeless Book?
Mustansir Mir

One of the long-standing objections levelled against the Qur'ān by its non-Muslim critics is that it appears to have no regular form or structure. It is said that its verses follow one another with little sense of interconnection and its sūrahs seem to have been arranged in a sequence based on the crude principle of diminishing length, the longest coming first and the shortest going to the end. Almost every sūrah, it is complained, is riddled with unsettling shifts of scene, address, and subject and one cannot with any amount of certainty predict what is going to come next. It is concluded that the Qur'ān is, at best, a remarkable compilation of unrelated passages, or a book of quotations. That though it is full of pearls, the pearls are lying in a promiscuous heap.

The actual words used by those who have raised this objection are much more stern and caustic. We will not quote them, partly because they may be found in any book written on the Qur'ān by any critic of Islam and partly because their pungency does not add to the gravity of the objection. We shall only note that new as well as old orientalists have made the point often and that for all the difference in their approaches to the Qur'ān, they are all agreed that the Qur'ān completely lacks anything of the kind of orderly arrangement. Some of them have actually tried to rearrange the Qur'ān either chronologically or according to some other self-devised principle.

The response of Muslim scholars to this objection has been, generally, concessive. They grant that the Qur'ān does not have the arrangement of a well-planned book, but then, they say, it was never meant to have one. The revelation of the Qur'ān, they point out, was completed in twenty-three years and during that period the Qur'ān dwelt on such a large number of diverse subjects that no act of compilation could have given it greater unity and coherence than that it now possesses. The Qur'ān, they say, dealt with the lives, activities, and problems of a whole nation for a long span of time and so any objection based on the concept of a research thesis is bound to be misplaced.

This reply, though it has almost always served to satisfy Muslims and at least silence non-Muslim critics, fails to take one very important fact into consideration, that of the arranging of the Qur'ān, by the Holy Prophet (sws). At the same time that it was being revealed, the Qur'ān was being rearranged in a certain form, under direct divine guidance, by the Holy Prophet (sws). The completion of the arrangement of the Qur'ān was conterminous in time with the completion of its revelation. In respect of order and sequence, therefore, the Qur'ān as it was compiled was different from the Qur'ān as it was revealed. In other words, the Qur'ān had two arrangements, one revelatory and the other compilatory. The question is, why was the revelatory arrangement abandoned in favour of a compilatory arrangement. Was the latter adopted without any special reason? If so, why was chronology not considered a sound enough basis for arranging the Qur'ān? And is one today at liberty to discover, if possible, the chronological arrangement of the Qur'ān and recite the Qur'ān according to that arrangement? Or, if chronology was not an acceptable guide, why was not some rule, that for example of dividing the Qur'ān into sūrahs of about equal length, employed. Nor does the principle of the progressive diminution of the size of sūrahs go very far because the diminution is not so progressive: We frequently find that long sūrahs are followed by shorter sūrahs which are again followed by long sūrahs and so on. The question continues to stare one in the face: Why a different arrangement ?

Imām Hamīd al-dīn Farāhī (India, d: 1930) gives another answer to the objection. He maintains that the Qur'ān has a most superb structure. The verses and sūrahs of the Qur'ān, he says, are arranged in a magnificent and impeccable order and together form a whole which has remarkable integration and symmetry. And beautiful as that structure is, adds Imām Farāhī, it is not merely of incidental value; it is essential to the meaning of the Qur'ān, nay, it is the only key there is to the meaning of the Qur'ān.

The seminal ideas of Imām Farāhī have been expounded by his most eminent disciple, Mawlānā Amīn Ahsan Islāhī. Taking his cue from the principles his great teacher had enunciated, Mawlānā Islāhī has written a commentary (in Urdu) on the Qur'ān in which he has shown how the Qur'ān is the systematic book Imam Farāhī claimed it to be. Mawlānā Islāhī modestly terms his work elaborative, but as anyone can see, it is highly original in any respect. In fact, he is not only the most authentic exponent of Imam Farāhī's thought, he can be said to have new-modelled that thought. Below is given a brief statement of his views on the structure of the Qur'ān. These views have been summarised from the 'Introduction' to 'Tadabbur-i-Qur'ān' (Reflection on the Qur'ān), which is the name of his commentary.

[1] Each Qur'ānic sūrah has a dominant idea, called the axis of that sūrah, around which all the verses of that sūrah revolve. Thus no verse, or no group of verses, stands alone but has a direct relation with the axis of the sūrah and is part of the coherent scheme of the sūrah.

[2] The sūrahs of the Qur'ān exist in pairs, the two sūrahs of any pair being complementary to each other and, together constituting a unit. There are a few exceptions, however. The first sūrah, Fātihah, does not have a complement, because it is a kind of a preface to the whole of the Qur'ān. All the other exceptions too are not exceptions in the real sense of the word since each one of them is an appendix to one or the other sūrah.

[3] The 114 sūrahs of the Qur'ān fall into seven groups. The first group comes to an end at sūrah 5, the second at sūrah 9, the third at sūrah 24, the fourth at sūrah 33, the fifth at sūrah 49, the sixth at sūrah 66, and the seventh at sūrah 114. Each group contains one or more Makkan sūrahs followed by one or more Madīnan sūrahs of the same cast. Like individual sūrahs or each pair of sūrahs, each group has a central theme which runs through all its sūrahs, knitting them into a distinct body. In each group, the themes of the other groups also occur but as subsidiary themes.

[4] Each group logically leads to the next, and thus all the groups become variations on the basic theme of the Qur'ān, which is: 'Allah's call to man to adopt the right path'.

While speaking of coherence in the structure of the Qur'ān, we must distinguish between connectedness and organic unity. A connection, howsoever weird and far-fetched, can be established between any two objects of the universe. But organic unity implies the presence of a harmonious interrelationship between the components of a body or entity which produces a unified whole, a whole which is over and above the sum total or the components of and has worth and meaning in itself. The verses and sūrahs of the Qur'ān are not simply linked up with one another, they have their place, each one of them, in the total scheme of the Qur'ān and are related not only to one another but also to that total framework. The Qur'ān is an organism, of which its verses and sūrahs are organically coherent parts.

Another point to be taken note of is that, as hinted above, the methodicalness of the Qur'ān is not just an incidental matter in the study of the Qur'ān, it is integral to the meaning of the Qur'ān. In plain terms, since the Qur'ān has an organic structure, every verse or group of verses and every sūrah has a definitive context and interpretation of any portion of the Qur'ān must be based on a correct understanding of that context. The Qur'ān is also one of the most unfortunate books in the sense that too often its verses have been torn out of context to prove some particular juristical opinion or sectarian notion and too frequently its terms and phrases have been misconstrued by those who come to it seeking, in some odd verse, support for views they have already formed on other than Qur'ānic grounds. It is indeed a great irony that all heresies have been claimed by their propounders to have their basis in the Qur'ān. And if these heresies looked plausible to many, it was because the context of the verses constituting the so-called 'basis in the Qur'ān' was not properly understood. As Mawlānā Islāhī has shown, contextualisation gives to countless verses a construction different from the one usually placed on them; it throws new light not only on the doctrinal and creedal aspects of the Qur'ānic message but also on the methodological aspects of the message; it lends new significance not only to the moral and legal injunctions of the Qur'ān but also to the stories and parables narrated by the Qur'ān; and it affords a deep insight not only into the continually changing style and tone of the Qur'ān but also into the varied patterns of logic it employs.

Is theLinguistic and Literary Miracle of the Quran Subjective?


Is theLinguistic and Literary Miracle of the Quran Subjective?
Hamza Andreas Tzortzis

The Qur’an is truly a unique expression of the Arabic language. Nothing has come before or after it, matching its literary form and style. There are many reasons for the Qur’ans uniqueness, some of these reasons include its:

1) Unique Literary Form [1]
2) Frequency of Rhetorical/Stylistic Features [2]

The inability of any person to produce anything like the Qur’an, due to its unique literary form, is the essence of the Qur’anic miracle. According to philosophers such as William Lane Craig a miracle is defined as “events which lie outside the productive capacity of nature”.[3] The argument posed by Muslim Theologians and Philosophers is that if, with the finite set of Arabic linguistic tools at humanity’s disposal, there is no effective challenge; then providing a naturalistic explanation for the Qur’an’s uniqueness is incoherent and doesn’t explain its inimitability. Forster Fitzgerald Arbuthnot who was a notable British Orientalist and translator states,

"..and that though several attempts have been made to produce a work equal to it as far as elegant writing is concerned, none has as yet succeeded."[4]

This is because the natural capacity of the text producer, or author, is able to produce the known literary forms in the Arabic language. The development of an entirely unique literary form and style is beyond the scope of the productive nature of any author, hence a supernatural entity, God, is the only sufficient comprehensive explanation. For millennia the speech and writings of Arabs has always fallen within the known forms and expressions of the Arabic language, but the Qur’an breaks this natural pattern due to its uniqueness.[5]

However, some people of other faiths and philosophical persuasions claim that what underpins the miracle of the Qur'an is subjective. In other words, the uniqueness of the Qur'an is not objective.
Let us examine if this is really the case.

Objective & Subjective

Let us take each inimitable feature, mentioned above, and discuss if they are based upon subjective or objective measures. Firstly let us deifne what objective and subjective is. For something to be objective it must be,

a. Uninfluenced by emotions or personal prejudices
b. Based on observable phenomena

Subjective means a process of understanding something that takes place within the mind and modified by individual bias. This individual bias can be influenced by what someone likes, dislikes and other emotions.

Is the 'Unique Literary Form' Argument Subjective?

The short answer is no. This argument is based upon the mechanical features of the Arabic language, it is not based upon aesthetic reception or dependent upon the readers or listeners emotional reactions. It presents the view that the Qur'an is either prose - which is further categorised as saj (rhymed prose) and mursal (normal speech) - or poetry.[6] These literary forms are clearly defined and have objective measures. For example rhymed prose is defined as,

1) Speech ending with a rhyme
2) Accentual rhythmical pattern
3) Concentrated use of rhetorical devices

Since the descriptions of the literary forms are based on observable phenomena [7], that are not influenced my emotions or aesthetic reception, then the literary form argument is objective. The Qur'an is either prose, poetry or unique. There is no grey area because the literary forms are clearly defined, and the key features of these forms are based upon observable measures.

Is the 'Highest Frequency of Rhetorical/Stylistic Features' Argument Subjective?

This argument is based upon the number of rhetorical and stylistic features. It is not based upon how effective they actually are. There is a big difference. If we were to present the argument that the effect of the Qur'ans language is a miracle, then this would be subjective as each individual's conclusions would be based upon individual bias. However, this argument is about frequency, an amount that can be counted and observed. Terms such as 'rhetorical' and 'stylstic features' are also based upon observed phenomena as they have agreed upon definitions.

Let us look at the shortest chapter in the Qur'an as an example. Surah (chapter) al-Kawthar has approximately 10 words. However, there are over 16 rhetorical and stylistic features present in this chapter. In other words this chapter is 'saturated' with rhetorical and stylistic features.

The argument, from an objective point of view, would be to try to imitate the Qur'an by producing three lines of Arabic using no less than 10 words with over 16 rhetorical and stylistic features. [8] This argument is objective as it is based on frequency - which is an observable phenomena - and not the effect of the literary and linguistic features.


Summary

1) Something to be defined as objective needs to be based on observable phenomena not influenced by emotions or personal prejudices
2) The miracle of the Qur'an is based on its unique liteary form and the frequency of rhetorical and stylistic features
3) The 'unique literary form' argument is based upon observable phenomena and clearly defined measures unifluenced by individual bias
4) The 'frequency of rhetorical and stylistc features' argument is based upon an amount that can be counted and observed regardless of individual bias.
5) The miracle of the Qur'an is objective and not subjective.

As can be seen point 5 logically follows. For more information please see the website http://www.theinimitablequran.com/.

References

[1] See Hamza Andreas Tzortzis. The Qur'ans Unique Literary Form. 2008. Available online http://www.theinimitablequran.com/uniquelitform.pdf
[2] See Hamza Andreasd Tzortzis. Frequency of Rhetorical Devices. 2008. Available online
http://www.theinimitablequran.com/rhetoricalfeatures.pdf; and Hamza Andreas Tzortzis. Matchless Eloquence: al-Kawthar. 2008. Available online http://www.theinimitablequran.com/eloquencechapteralkawthar.pdf
[3] See Stephen S. Bilynskyj, 'God, Nature, and the Concept of Miracle' (Ph.D. Diss.: Notre Dame, 1982) 10-42; and "The Problem of Miracles: A Historical and Philosophical Perspective." In Gospel Perspectives VI, pp.9-40. Edited by David Wenham and Craig Blomberg. Sheffield, England: JSOT Press, 1986. Available online.
[4] F.F. Arbuthnot. 1885.The Construction of the Bible and the Koran. London.
[5] See Why is the Qur'an a Miracle? Available online
http://www.theinimitablequran.com/whymiracle.pdf
[6] See reference [1]
[7] See reference [1]
[8] See reference [2]

A Formula For Victory: Salah Ad-Din as a Model


A Formula for Victory

Salah Ad-Din as a Model

Living Shari`ah Staff- www.islamonline.net

Undoubtedly Muslims have a great deal of attention in today’s world. They are subjected to wars, massacres and detention in concentration camps. Their land is being captured, their treasures are stolen and their children are brutally killed. People observe this and acknowledge it but they simply do not know why it is happening. Among Muslims there are those who are starting to lose heart, and sometimes lose faith that tomorrow could be better than today. They scream loudly " When is the victory of Allah" and Allah says (Victory from Allah is surely near.) (Al-Baqarah 2:214 )

The phenomenon of depression is not new in history. Usually people feel overwhelmed very quickly. Some –if not most - Muslims feel that they are confronting a situation where they feel helpless, and they start to develop a fatalistic approach when dealing with matters. Muslims may start to feel that they have absolutely no power to make any difference. They even start to believe that change will only be for the worse and that there will be no positive results in the foreseeable future.

Living in the age of communication magnifies the negative effect that is being felt.

Whenever something happens in one part of the globe people instantaneously know about it in other parts. This is due to faxes, the internet, telephones and televisions that were not known in the past.

In the past, bad things happened, and sometimes, the worst possible scenario became a reality, yet it would take long periods of time before people came to know what had happened. Moreover, by the time the news reached the other parts of the world, the impact would already have passed.

We should not feel that we have been singled out by the catastrophes of this day and age.

Almighty Allah says,

(If a wound has afflicted you, a wound like it has also afflicted the (unbelieving) people; and We bring these days to men by turns, and that Allah may know those who believe and take witnesses from among you; and Allah does not love the unjust.) (Aal `Imran 3:140)

It is very important that we understand that if we are touched by a wound, other people have also been touched by a similar wound, and that such days rotate among mankind.

Therefore, we are not alone in this; and in the battle of life it is not crucial to win every battle. As long as our intension is pure, victory will eventually come. Salah Ad-Din, the great mujahid was a clear example of this. Even though he did not win every battle, his steadfastness and perseverance, his faith and strong belief in Allah's words and His promise lead him to great victory during the Crusades.

Salah Ad-Din Al-Ayyubi (Saladin) was able to conquer the Crusaders in the battle of Hattin in AH 583, thereby restoring Al-Quds ( Jerusalem ) and many other countries that had been occupied by the Crusaders back to the Muslims. No one imagined that this could possibly happen, but it did.

He spent his life striving for the sake of Almighty Allah. He saved not any effort to help the oppressed Muslims in Al-Quds nor did he enjoy the life of princes – which he could do- but rather, he dedicated his life to rescuing Al-Quds and its people

He even rejected his men’s suggestion to have a recess during the month of Ramadan saying, “Man’s life span is short, death gives no appointment and leaving the occupiers in the Muslims’ lands for a single day more, despite having ability to drive them out, is an abominable act that I could not bear.” He proceeded with his conquests throughout this blessed month and continued until he died.

We should never look to Salah Ad-Din as a person, because he was not merely an individual, but rather a phenomenon; a gift that Almighty Allah bestowed on the Ummah because they reached the point where they started to deserve victory.

Almighty Allah gave us a simple formula, and if we abide by it victory will be near at hand. The magic formula that we do not pay much attention to these days is, (in tansuru Allah yansurkum)- (O you who believe! If you help (the cause of) Allah, He will help you and make firm your feet.)(Muhammad 47:7)

If we obey Almighty Allah, He will give us victory in return. This is very simple. And obeying Allah indeed encompasses care, compassion and help for the oppressed Muslims all over the world and especially in the occupied Palestine.

Another example is from the Battle of Badr which reshaped the history of Muslims in the early days.

Almighty Allah tells us a simple historical fact (Allah had helped you at Badr, when ye were a contemptible little force; then fear Allah; thus May ye show your gratitude.)(Aal `Imran 3:123)

Why did Almighty Allah do that? He did so because they deserved to be victorious; because they had grasped the meaning of being in resonance with the teachings of Almighty Allah.

They knew that the material means –even though important - are not significant if compared to Allah's Power and Might. Victory is simply a gift from Almighty Allah to those who deserve it. Had we deserved victory these days, we would have been victorious.

To achieve victory, we should be first victorious over ourselves, our desires and our ego. The battle of the self is the first we should win. Victory is stability. It is to live according to the teachings of the Qur’an and the traditions of Prophet Muhammad (peace and blessings be upon him).

If we look at the world today, we will realize that our communities all over the world are making mistakes. We have gone far away from the Qur’an and the Sunnah of the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him). Therefore, we really need to reexamine the situation from a different angle, not from the angle of gathering abundant material power because it is not enough – though important -to achieve victory. What we really need to do is to go back and change our own selves from within, and, I would say, after a few years, if not a few months, we will start to see the modern phenomenon of Salah Ad-Din returning and things will start to reform.

At the time of the Tatars the world seemed ready to be devoured by their magnificent superpower. However, they actually turned to Islam in droves and embraced it. What appeared to be an impossible scenario just happened, because Allah is The One Who has the key to the hearts and He is The One Who grants victory to whoever He wills.

(victory is only from Allah, the Mighty, the Wise.) (Aal `Imran 3:126)

Victory does not come from us, victory does not come from our large numbers; it comes only from Allah the Most Dignified, the All-Wise and He grants it when He sees that we have learned our lesson.

Almighty Allah says,

( Or do ye think that ye shall enter the Garden (of bliss) without such (trials) as came to those who passed away before you? they encountered suffering and adversity, and were so shaken in spirit that even the Messenger and those of faith who were with him cried: "When (will come) the help of Allah?" Ah! Verily, the help of Allah is (always) near!) (Al-Baqarah 2:214 )

These verses tells us that we are going through a kind of test. It is a tribulation that we have to undergo, because the worldly life is not the end in itself; that whatever we go through is something that we have to face in order to prepare ourselves for the hereafter.

Imagine that the servants of Allah started to ask the question: When are we going to achieve victory? This verse is actually a good reminder that we are not alone in these (hard) days because the people before us faced trials and tribulations until they started to be shaken and uprooted so much so that the believers who accepted faith with the Messenger (peace and blessings be upon him) started to ask when they will achieve victory! The answer comes from Almighty Allah: Verily victory is near at hand.

Another tough day the Muslims faced in their history was the day of Hunain.

(Certainly Allah helped you in many battlefields and on the day of Hunain, when your great numbers made you vain, but they availed you nothing and the earth became strait to you notwithstanding its spaciousness, then you turned back retreating.) (At-Tawbah 9:25)

During the Battle of Hunain the Muslims started to feel good about their great numbers. This is another side of the equation. It was the first time in the history of the Muslims that they had gathered a number of fighters equal to that of their enemies. They had twelve thousand troops. They were just equal in number to their enemy, while previously they had been much less in number. On that day they started to feel that they were going to achieve victory; and we know what happened after that. In the beginning, they started to lose heart, because they did not really recognize that victory does not come from manpower, but victory is from Allah the Sublime the All-Powerful.

Therefore, let's start doing our part; let’s return to Almighty Allah and clean our selves from within. Purifying ourselves is what really matters, and to be sincere in the way we deal with situations and with each other.

Let's feel the communal strength of the Muslims, and put our hands together in love and support for each other . Let's invite the world to see our true and genuine reality. We are not - like some narrow-minded people think - a group of desperate people who want to threaten the entire world. This is not part of Islam. Had Islam been so, the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings be upon him) in At-Ta’if would have behaved differently. He did not - despite the harsh treatment he had received from them - lose hope or become desperate; rather, he invoked Allah the Almighty to lead them to the wisdom of Islam and the beauty of da`wah.

It is our duty now to start making lots of du`aa’ to Almighty Allah and ask Him to return the phenomenon of Salah Ad-Din. When we start to deserve it and in sha’ Allahwe will - it will come.

We are no different from those who were before us; we just need to start and we will see that the promise of Almighty Allah is true and will come to pass, because it is not the promise of a human being, it is a divine promise. All we need to do is begin, and feel that we can do it. Salah Ad-Din is waiting just around the corner.